tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3907216.post8442736451022975605..comments2024-03-22T22:39:49.773-05:00Comments on I don't know, but . . .: Clarificationjameshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01792036361407527304noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3907216.post-11625734957529841502013-06-27T13:56:42.972-05:002013-06-27T13:56:42.972-05:00"Defined"! heavens, no. Nothing but a ..."Defined"! heavens, no. Nothing but a flyer of a speculative thought. Might make a good scifi story.Texan99https://www.blogger.com/profile/10479561573903660086noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3907216.post-9029421470333181982013-06-27T13:37:37.994-05:002013-06-27T13:37:37.994-05:00That's one interpretation, but not a popular o...That's one interpretation, but not a popular one, because it requires a "somewhere else" that isn't defined either. "Anyone who is not shocked by quantum theory has not understood it." Niels Bohr (variant: "If you think you can talk about quantum theory without feeling dizzy, you haven't understood the first thing about it.")jameshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01792036361407527304noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3907216.post-68951778176876855682013-06-27T13:29:07.631-05:002013-06-27T13:29:07.631-05:00I've always wondered if a legitimate way to th...I've always wondered if a legitimate way to think about these puzzling not-quite-there wavicles, with their strangely cyclical properties, was that they rotate in and and out of our plane of existence from "somewhere else." Maybe they're not here much of the time, and they can get from here to there without crossing the intervening space in the conventional way.Texan99https://www.blogger.com/profile/10479561573903660086noreply@blogger.com