Both stories will be presumed bad decisions in this country, and stir strong emotions: Trump-hate/fear and concern for the idealized homeless.
But the more important decision didn't appear until page 8--overturning Chevron. At least I assume that how we use laws to regulate ourselves is more important than the rather obvious observation that forbidding campsites in city parks isn't equivalent to hang/draw/quartering someone.
I assume the Journal knows its audience, and how to tickle its ears. Still...
The journalism doesn't just hurt; it 516-terahertz. ;รพ
ReplyDelete