Claustrophobic may be just me, but I'm probably not alone.
"Fragile" comes in several ways.
The ground shifts. What did your rail line just do?
If you make skyscrapers too tall you run into elevator capacity problems. You can avoid that in The Line by replicating everything every few miles, so you don't have to travel from one end to the other to get home. Except 1) people aren't quite like that; if this week's hot performer is appearing in the theater in Mile 82 you'll attract fans from all over and 2) it seems to lend itself to partitioning, with tribal zones appearing just as they do in Baltimore.
If a disaffected or striking group wanted to choke off transit, it would seem very hard to guard against--because they could strike almost anywhere, and there's no obvious way to flank blockages.
You can probably think of several others. I doubt this would be run as efficiently as the scheme Niven and Pournelle envisioned, though the conflicts outsiders seem like a reasonable prediction.
Another way to look at it is "What's in it for me?" "Why should I move there?"
- if you're a single out of school--flexibility
- married with small children--does it have schools, places to play?
- a gardener--where can I plant?
- someone with mobility problems--close to transport and to aides
- married with older kids who need more challenges, like first jobs--oh wait this is Saudi Arabia
That's an American way of looking at it. A more natural question, under the circumstances, might be "Where do my wives and my children and my cousins and my grandparents and so on fit in?" Physical distance matters--for that matter, just being on a different floor from another group at work can cut down communications. Will people be satisfied with adjacent apartments, or does one need large suites?
UPDATE: See comments
