The very next clause in 7:1 is "It is good for a man not to touch a woman." I find it a little hard to believe that the scholar Paul would have so forgotten about the first recorded commandment as to make such a blanket claim.
Likewise in chapter 10 he makes the provacative statement "All things are lawful", which seems to flatly contradict his statements in chapters 5 and 6 detailing unlawful things.
The difficulties vanish if he is quoting the Corinthian elders' letter. I'd suppose that they, in reaction to the moral atmosphere(*), made the extreme claim about sex, probably buttressed with examples as to why. And they explained their reasoning for allowing Christians to eat meat sacrificed to idols -- offsite. So I think of the text as containing quotation marks, and Paul is arguing against their application of the claim on their own terms.
(*)"To corinthianize" may refer to the Greek Corinth, destroyed by Romans in 146BC and rebuilt as a Roman city in 44BC. Or maybe both cities.
No comments:
Post a Comment