Flip the focus: If Shakespeare had modern theater layout and equipment at his disposal, would he keep the old staging or chuck it for something easier? Sets would be easier to manage, and entrances and exits be more flexible with the modern layout. The compromises on which way the actors face would be different--I'd think easier. And he'd have much better behaved audiences.
I suspect he would enthusiastically take to using actresses.
But if you introduced him to movies, and the possibilities in retakes and mixing close-ups and medium shots, would he hire a producer and switch? I'm not expert, but what I've seen suggests that movies need more and more varied visual action than stage plays--or at any rate, people expect it so it has to be there. What approaches he would use? He liked to throw in puns and bawdy jokes--maybe some slapstick?
I'd bet he'd keep an eye on what the modern customers wanted, and make the productions shorter.
And I'd bet the Shakespeare scholars would disdain the movies.
1 comment:
He competed successfully with bear-baiting, so I'm betting you are right.
Post a Comment