Here is a list of quotes and "allusions" in the New Testament to the Old. Some of these are "it is written" references that assume the authority of the passage cited, while others are parallel—and sometimes it's a bit of a stretch.
The New Testament also contains a few obvious references to non-canonical material, for example: "Cretans are always liars", "in Him we live and move and exist", and the difficult one, referring to Enoch's prophecy. The first link is an obvious joke paradox, and the second was quoting their own writers to some pagan Greeks.
The Enoch one is hard – the book of Enoch as we have it is a mess (in my not so humble opinion). Some scholars think at least some of it dates to about 100BC, though parts may be older. The Jews think it contradicts the Torah, and though several early church fathers thought it valid scripture, today only a couple of Ethiopian churches do. I had a little trouble keeping the thread of the book sometimes. It is heavily into judgment – in fact, 1 Enoch 1:1-2 seems to say that it is meant for the last generation before judgment.
FWIW, Jude also quotes from the now-lost Assumption of Moses—so say several early Church Fathers who still had access to the work.
Whether what we have of Enoch is what Jude had (and the Qumran folks) I can't say. Jude's citation seems perfectly innocuous; the confusion comes from his attribution of the quote to "Enoch the 7th from Adam." I'm content, after having read it, to agree with everybody but the Ethiopians and read Enoch no more.
At any rate, the obvious question is: Are there citations of the Deuterocanonical books in the New Testament? (The next obvious question is, are those books cited by the early Church Fathers? Yes, they are, but I haven't investigated how significant the citations are. And they approvingly cite books that nobody includes in canon, so the Fathers are not the sturdiest reeds for this sort of evaluation.)
So, I looked around and found a list of alleged references at scripturecatholic.com.
At one point the list says "James 2:23 – it was reckoned to him as righteousness follows 1 Macc. 2:52 – it was reckoned to him as righteousness." I think one could argue that Genesis is older than Maccabees, and refer to Genesis 15:6 instead. There are several such dubious references.
The list also has lots of what look like reasonable parallels. It links Pauls' "sacrifice to demons and not to God" to Baruch 4:7, which is a quite reasonable parallel, though not a "it is written" class of citation.
And there are a lot of sort-of parallels that I'd not really count unless the New Testament author explicitly made the connection for me, as Matthew does.
All in all, I don't see the same sort of obvious connections to the deuterocanonicals that there are to (some of) the rest of the Old Testament. That doesn't rule out canonicity, of course—most of the Old Testament isn't cited either. The New Testament would be much longer if it did that.
If there were such a "it is written" citation to Judith, I'd bet there wouldn't have been any argument about including it.
No comments:
Post a Comment